We independently review everything we recommend. When you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.
9 oz. (255 g) for a US M9,
7.5 oz (215 g) for a US W7.5
36 mm in heel, 30 mm in forefoot (6 mm drop)
Daily training, tempo, budget race day
14% more Lightstrike Pro in forefoot, carbon fiber EnergyRods, LightTraxion outsole rubber on lateral side, Continental rubber in forefoot
$160 / May 5, 2025
Adidas Boston 13 design sketch (courtesy of Adidas)
THOMAS: Over the years, the Adidas Boston has shifted its purpose. Once the shoe you’d lace up to race the Boston Marathon, it’s now the shoe you wear to train for it. Why Adidas chose to steer a race shoe toward the daily grind — especially one named after such a storied event — is anyone’s guess. What I can tell you is that the Boston line has seen its share of highs and lows, but with the last two versions, it seems to have settled into its stride. Today, it stands as one of the most versatile trainers you’ll find.
The latest model, the Boston 13, doesn’t stray far from the Boston 12 — and that’s a good thing. Adidas made changes where they were needed, mostly to the upper, adding comfort without overcomplicating the design. The old, minimal heel counter has been swapped for a padded, more traditional fit. Adidas listened to its runners and made smart, quiet improvements.
Underfoot, the story is much the same. The midsole now holds 14% more Lightstrike Pro, with Lightstrike foam still reinforcing the heel for stability. EnergyRods return, offering their signature blend of stiffness and snap. The drop is slightly lower — 6 mm now, down from 7 mm — but the difference is hard to notice on the run. The outsole gets a subtle but welcome tweak, pairing LightTraxion rubber (the same rubber found in the Adios Pro 4) with the familiar grip of Continental rubber.
In the end, even with all these updates, the Boston 13 runs like the Boston 12. The most noticeable changes are the ones you’ll feel before you take your first stride: a more secure heel and a better-padded tongue.
Layers of the Adidas Boston 13 (photo courtesy of Adidas)
MEAGHAN: I’ve never been a big fan of the Adidas Adizero Boston line; in fact, I didn’t even bother taking versions 10 or 11 out of the box. But last year’s update added a layer of Lightstrike Pro – a softer, more resilient foam, which finally convinced me to give them a try. My main gripe of version 12 was the lack of padding and comfort in the upper. Well, wouldn’t you know it, version 13 brings a redesigned engineered mesh upper, new eyestays, and added cushioning around the collar and heel. Adidas also packed in 14% more Lightstrike Pro underfoot, even with a slightly lower stack height. The weight’s unchanged, and it still looks every bit like a Boston. But the real question is, how did it feel out on the road?
Shop The Shoe - Men Shop The Shoe - WomenTHOMAS: Let’s start by categorizing the Boston 13. This is the most versatile shoe in the Adidas running lineup, a one-and-done trainer. What I mean by that is, you can use the Boston as a daily trainer, tempo shoe, and even a race day shoe. Where other shoes are tuned for specific training, the Boston can switch gears and cover all the bases. All except one: I would want a soft cushioned shoe for recovery days, maybe something in the Supernova line, or even the Ultraboost 5X. But other than that, you can squeeze a lot out of the Boston 13.
The Boston 12 heel counter and tongue were not an issue for me, but a few vocal runners expressed a distaste for the minimal approach and some even got their Achilles scraped up by the heel counter. They will be happy to find the update to the 13 includes a more traditional padded heel counter and some padding added to the tongue.
New LightTraxion outsole rubber on lateral side (photo courtesy of Adidas)
The upper, made of perforated engineered mesh, fits true to size and breathes well. The outsole’s traction is tacky and smooth without obtrusive lugs. As for the weight, the Boston 13 weighs 9.8 oz./278 grams. That is on the heavy side for racing but the lighter side for a daily trainer.
Another reason the Adizero Boston 13 might be a good pick is its durability. Lightstrike Pro is one of the premium foams that holds up well over time compared to some PEBA-based foams. The Continental rubber and LightTraxion foam combo will also be able to grind out the miles/kilometers.
MEAGHAN: I was pleasantly surprised by how much better the step-in feel is compared to the previous version. The added padding around the collar and tongue makes a noticeable difference in comfort without adding any extra weight (my W7.5 still came in at 7.5 oz). Bonus points for the clean white and teal colorway, which I absolutely love. The new mesh upper also feels more structured and supportive, and I had none of the lacing issues I experienced before. No hot spots, no rubbing, and the fit is spot on. The last model felt a bit roomy, but this one fits just right.
While the midsole setup hasn’t changed drastically, there’s now more Lightstrike Pro foam and a slightly lower stack height (2 mm less), but the ride still feels very similar to the previous version. The Boston continues to offer a firmer, more responsive feel, thanks to the combination of Lightstrike and Lightstrike Pro with EnergyRods sandwiched in the midsole. It’s a shoe that feels built for tempo days, essentially a fast daily trainer. I wouldn’t reach for it on recovery days, but for easy miles that might turn a little spicy, it’s a solid choice. I’ve found myself using it in the same way I use the Puma Deviate Nitro 3.
Shop The Shoe - Men Shop The Shoe - WomenTHOMAS: I was hoping the additional 14% of Lightstrike Pro would give the forefoot a little more bounce, but the Boston 13 actually feels, if anything, a shade firmer than the 12. The blend of dual foams — stable in the heel, cushioned up front — is a smart design in theory. I just wish Adidas had pushed that feeling further.
Adidas lacing systems always look straightforward, yet somehow, like assembling Ikea furniture, they never seem easy to dial in perfectly. Getting a solid lockdown takes trial and error. I noticed some heel lift in the 13, so I turned to the runner’s loop for a better fit — only to find the laces too short. Would including an extra pair of longer laces solve the problem or just create more waste? I’ll leave that question to the shoe philosophers.
MEAGHAN: Like Thomas, I was hoping the added Lightstrike Pro would translate to a softer, more cushioned ride, but that wasn’t quite the case. As someone who typically gravitates toward softer, bouncier shoes, it’s hard not to reach for the Evo SL over the Boston 13. I guess this isn’t so much a knock on the shoe, but more of a personal preference.
THOMAS: I appreciate what the Adizero Boston 13 brings to the table. If you’re not the kind of runner who keeps a rotation of shoes, this one could do the job on its own. It’s a jack of all trades – though, like most, a master of none.
The Boston 13 is at its best as a daily trainer. But if all I wanted were easy, steady miles, I’d probably reach for the Adizero Evo SL. It handles tempo runs well enough, too, though if I were chasing a true tempo shoe, I’d lean toward the Adizero Takumi Sen. And while you could absolutely line up for a half marathon or full marathon in the Boston, the Adizero Adios Pro 4 would be my first choice for race day.
That said, if I were traveling and only had room for one shoe, the Boston 13 would be hard to beat.
Other shoes that sit in the same category: Puma Deviate Nitro 3, Asics Superblast 2, New Balance SC Trainer v3, Nike Zoom Fly 6, Saucony Endorphin Speed 4, and the Hoka Mach X 2.
MEAGHAN: If you liked the Adizero Boston 12, you’ll find the Boston 13 to be a well-executed update. It’s not a radical redesign, but rather a thoughtful refinement of the previous version. The upper – one of the key complaints last time around – has been improved for better comfort and fit, while the overall weight remains unchanged. For those of you looking in the super trainer category, the Boston 13 stands out as a strong, dependable option.
You can pick up the Adidas Adizero Boston 13 for $160 on May 5, 2025, at adidas.com using the buttons below.
Shop The Shoe - Men Shop The Shoe - WomenWant to learn more about how our review process works? Check out this guide.
Have something to say? Leave a Comment
As the founder of Believe in the Run, Thomas’s goal is to help runners pick the shoes and gear that will make their running experience the best that it can be.
More from ThomasMeaghan signed up for her first marathon three weeks before the race, because it was $10 more than the half she planned to run. She learned everything in running the hard way. Now a USATF & UESCA certified run coach, she loves encouraging friends to go for big goals as she continues to chase faster times. She enjoys a hot cup of coffee, a cold martini, and making bagels for friends and family.
More from Meaghan
I’ll prob like it, but galling that Adidas seems to be the outlier in terms of weird, uncomfortable, unreliable lacing.
At one point, the Boston was my go-to. It lost me with 10 and 11, like most. I never tried 12 and last year went with the Puma Deviate Nitro 3 as it reminded me of Bostons of old.
But the Nitro 3 is almost a year old. And the Boston 13, while overdue, has that new shoe feel.
Between the two, which one would you pick?
Love the B12s for tempo runs and an all rounder with good grip for travel that also looks sharp
enough if you have to wear it Ont he airport or train station. Added the EvL recently, and have fallen in love with the TYR Valkerie Speedworks (too aggressive a rocker for travel use). If the b13 goes on sale by September, I’ll probably get a pair, but think the EVO SL stands as my all rounder when I’m not rocking the TYR for long runs and tempos. Full PEBA/LSP in these two shoes will be hard to forego.
The Boston 12 has been an excellent do-it-all shoe for me. I am approaching 500 miles in my pair, and they still feel good. I tried out the DVN3 as a possible replacement, and it felt clunky. I am excited for the B13, though, as the updates only seem positive. Caveats are that I am a tall, narrow-footed runner who likes a slightly firmer, responsive ride.
Gary,
If I had to choose between the two models, I would pick neither and would instead go with the Adidas EVO SL. It’s hands down the best mid range priced Adidas Runner to date. I swear by it for Interval training, 5K, and up to half marathon personally, though I’ve seen many complete a full marathon in them. They are built to make you go faster. You will literally take extra steps to come to a stop if you are running with any kind of tempo other than walking.