Best Running Shoes For Heavy Runners (2025)

Introduction to the Best Shoes for Heavy Runners

NOTE: This is an evergreen list (last updated 8/28/2025). Bookmark this page and check back for all the latest running shoe recommendations for bigger runners.

When I first approached the Believe in the Run team about what I felt was a lack of online shoe reviews by bigger or heavier runners, I had hoped that I’d be able to help runners who found themselves in the same position I was: frustrated by a lack of representation in the online shoe review world. 

I would always do research on running shoes before buying, reading countless reviews, and many times ended up disappointed when getting the shoe. This may be pretty obvious, but smaller or “average” size runners experience shoes in a totally different way than bigger runners. And in case you haven’t noticed, most of the reviewers you see online aren’t built like me. It was frustrating, because every review had to be taken with a grain of salt.

The Believe in the Run crew welcomed me with open arms to be the resident Big & Tall reviewer, and Robbe gave me the nickname “The Clydesdale.” Since joining the team, I’ve been logging miles in many different shoes for review purposes, as well as others that I bought myself because they were a great deal and I’m a sucker for a bargain. When I was asked if I would consider putting together a list of what I felt in my opinion were the best shoes for bigger runners, I was stoked.

Now, I will preface this by saying this list is my list of the best running shoes for bigger or heavier runners. Obviously, there will be some subjectivity in this list, because every runner is different and what works for me as a bigger runner might not suit you. I’ve also not been able to test every or most shoes on the market, especially race day shoes… yet.

However, I believe all of the shoes on my list have attributes that I look for as a bigger runner, and I further believe they’re all worth testing out if you’re a bigger runner in the market for a new shoe. This list will be updated as I test shoes that I feel are worthy of being included here. It goes without saying, but if you want to discuss running shoes or have any questions, hit me up on Instagram, and I’ll try to help you out the best I can.

Just a heads up, this list is split into three sections: daily trainers, super trainers, and race day shoes. Shoe models are listed in alphabetical order, so read the whole way through to get the full rundown!

Move over Boston 11, the Boston 12 has officially taken your spot in my rotation!  The Boston 11s had previously been one of my favorite daily trainers for bigger runners because they were firm and snappy underfoot and felt fast on the run.  The Boston 12s continue these positives, adding in just a little bit more cushioning underfoot with slightly more Lightstrike Pro and the new and improved Lightstrike 2.0 midsole foam.  By and large, the changes made to the Bostons this year are positive, and they are still a great daily trainer for bigger runners.

One of the best updates was the change in upper mesh.  It feels far more comfortable on the foot and it makes the shoe easier to get on than the 11s.  And of course, the Boston 12 still features Continental rubber for the outsole, which can’t be beat in inclement weather.

I’m going to be honest with you, I had absolutely no idea in which category to put the Brooks Glycerin Max. I have used this shoe for everyday miles, recovery runs, and long runs; only thing I haven’t done is tempo runs or races. I think for some people, this shoe would have the feel of a super trainer– the new DNA Tuned midsole foam is that good. I put it in the daily trainer category simply because I think it is so versatile.

The insane rocker and toe spring gets you up on your toes so seamlessly, and the softer heel foam and more responsive midfoot and toe foam create an incredibly fluid and pleasant ride. This shoe is an absolute game changer for Brooks, and apparently, it’s only the start of new things to come from the brand that is often criticized for its lack of innovation. We’ve already seen it in the Glycerin 22, so you can expect more of this type of excellence from more models coming in 2025 and beyond.

You ever have one of those shoes where it’s hard to put your finger on exactly what it is about the shoe that makes you feel this way, but you really love it? That is how I feel about the New Balance 880v14. The upper fits comfortably on the foot (albeit perhaps a wee bit high volume), the foam has the perfect blend of cushioning while being firm and responsive underfoot. The roll through is super smooth and the miles just fly by when wearing them.

I found these to be a much more suitable offering for bigger runners than its companion, the 1080v13. I found the 1080v13 was just a bit too soft and lacked stability to the point of causing some tendon issues. However, the 880v14 has a wider platform and a firmer composition of Fresh Foam X which provides a nice, stable ride.

As I mentioned in my blurb on the 880v14, I did not get along with the New Balance 1080v13; the foam was just a bit too soft for me and the stability was lacking, so my ankles were displeased with me after testing for review purposes. However, the 1080v14 came and totally redeemed itself. The newest iteration of the Fresh Foam X in in the v14 is slightly firmer but that gives it a more responsive feel vs. being soft and squishy. 

That extra responsiveness and a slightly wider platform provide just the right amount of stability. Combined with the rocker profile and a nicer upper, the 1080v14 is a major upgrade. The newest model did gain an ounce of weight, but it isn’t that noticeable.

I love it when a brand releases a shoe and it is better almost all the way across the Board. Topo Athletic did just that in releasing the Phantom 4 in 2025. The Phantom 3 was on this list from 2023 when it was released, and the fourth version earned its spot here. The Phantom 4 maintained the wide and stable platform of the prior version while increasing the stack height by 2 mm and improving the already incredibly balanced ZipFoam midsole. Between that and the rocker, the Phantom 4 has one of the smoothest rides you can find in a daily trainer. They even improved on the aesthetics, which is hard to do with an anatomical toebox.

I was torn about what category to put the Brooks Ghost Max 3 in. I had previously included the Ghost Max and Ghost Max 2 as some of my favorite recovery day shoes, considering their higher stack (which is relative, because it still is only 39mm in the heel, which is high for Brooks). However, the ride of the Ghost Max 3 sort of blended the soft, cushiony feel of the OG Ghost Max and the firmer, more responsive feel of the Ghost Max 2.

So, for some people, the Ghost Max 3 might make an awesome daily trainer, and for others, it might be a bit more of a recovery day shoe, given its weight. That said, regardless of how you deploy it in your rotation, the Ghost Max 3 is a very solid shoe for bigger runners, with the GlideRoll rocker and 6mm drop for a decently smooth ride. I found it could be a little slappy at times, but that could have been just a “me” thing.

No surprise here. The New Balance Fresh Foam More v6 is a continuation of the incredible line, with the More v4 and More v5 both previously being my favorite recovery day shoes. Not much changed at all from the More v5 to v6, basically just an upper update. But if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

This is definitely not the shoe designed for fast-paced miles, and due to its weight and size, I would likely not take it out for double-digit runs. But for those recovery-day miles, this shoe can’t be beat, with its wide platform and the soft yet somewhat bouncy Fresh Foam X that’s also featured in the 1080 line.

So, I appreciate that On has decided to “streamline” its lineup, even if it’s only in its naming conventions. With so many brands out there and so many darn shoes, it can be hard to keep up. On ditched the name Cloudeclipse after just one version, changing the name of its successor to the Cloudsurfer Max. However, the changes made in the two years since the original came out are more than just the name.

On somehow improved on what I thought was a great upper, by dialing in the fit a little bit and making it less baggy. They also removed the plastic speedboard on the bottom which was unnecessarily noisy, a detriment that likely was not outweighed by any torsional support it provided. The Cloudsurfer Max still isn’t as soft and squishy as a lot of the “max stack” shoes in the market; but for bigger runners, that isn’t necessarily a bad thing. The ride is smooth and the Phasetec system and Helion foam provide a nice feel underfoot. Just make sure to leave yourself enough time to get your laces tied to the properly tightness.

This just in:  Topo Athletic makes really good running shoes. Not only that, but their shoes seem to work really well for bigger runners. I already had the Phantom 3 as one of my favorite daily trainers, but then I got in the Atmos for testing and review. I immediately fell in love with the Atmos, which is Topo’s first foray into the max cushion arena.

The rocker geometry with the 5mm drop and the soft-but-not-too-soft cushioning of the high stack of ZipFoam all combine to create a smooth and comfortable ride for slow, easy miles.  Add in the wide base and anatomical toebox, you get a stable-neutral max cushioning shoe, something the running world can always use more of.

The Atmos has become my go-to recovery day shoe, with the Brooks Ghost Max coming in a close second.

There was definitely a schism in Believe in the Run last year, caused by the Adidas Adizero Prime X2 Strung. Bigger runners like me and, I believe, Wide Foot Jarrett loved the shoe. I think it comes from a higher likelihood that we could compress the slightly firmer Lightstrike Pro midsole foam and the double plates. Truth be told, the same may happen with the Prime X3 Strung, despite the several changes that Adidas made. First, there are three different densities of Lightstrike Pro foam, going from softest underfoot to firmer near the outsole. The shoe shed some weight by creating a midsole cutout in the midfoot, and swapped one of the plates for Energy Rods 2.0.

I did 13 miles in this shoe for my second run in them, and my legs felt great that same day and the next. My only issue is the harsh laces with no protection for the top of the foot, which led to some lace bite issues. That was easily remedied by a $10 purchase of some stretchier, less harsh laces. Going from the double plates to a plate and rods also made the underfoot feel a bit more forgiving.

If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Boy, did Asics take that phrase to heart with the Superblast 2! Unfortunately I was not able to get a pair of the shoes during the initial drop for review so I missed out on the epic Paris colorway. However, Asics was able to send me a pair of the light gray and light blue version when that was ready for the public. The Superblast 2 is as good, if not better, than the original. The original Superblast was my favorite shoe of all-time; last year, I ran a 44-minute marathon PR in the shoe. The upper is a bit more comfortable in the v2 and there is absolutely zero break-in period. The shoes felt out of the box like what the originals did after 25-30 miles. 

One change from v1 to v2 is that they shortened the shoe a bit to bring the sizing more in line with other Asics models. For example, I normally wear a 12 in Asics, but got the original in a size 11.5. My pair of the Superblast 2 is also an 11.5 and my toes have slightly less room; not so tight that it’s a problem, but just something to consider.  That said, don’t be surprised to hear soon that my favorite shoe of all time goes from being the Superblast to the Superblast 2 in short order.

My runs in the Hoka Skyward X had me thinking of two specific three-letter words:  (1) wow and (2) fun.  The “wow” comes from the fact that this shoe is some sort of engineering anomaly. How Hoka could create such a stable ride in a shoe that has an ultra high stack and soft foam is pure insanity. The Skyward X feels so solid from initial step-in through every mile of the run, it has cemented itself into my rotation even beyond the review period, and that comes from the “fun” part of the shoe. The bounce and toe off of the Skyward X provides so much energy return, it almost feels like cheating when running in it.

The biggest knock is definitely the weight. There’s no sugarcoating it, the shoe is a thiccboy and tips the scales. On shorter runs it isn’t noticeable, but those extra ounces add up as the miles increase.

Hands down, the Mizuno Neo Vista 2 is going to earn a podium spot for best looking shoe of 2025. But aesthetics aside, the shoe performs as good as it looks, which is really saying something! Bootyknit uppers are always so hit or miss, but Mizuno hit an absolute grand slam with the Neo Vista 2. The upper hugs the foot well and keeps you over the high stack of dual-density Enerzy NXT foam which is bouncy AF. Add in a glass fiber plate and Mizuno’s rocker that they called Smooth Speed Assist, and the Neo Vista 2 has anything I could want in a super-trainer, and more.

This is another shoe that made what it seems like were small changes but the changes were all upgrades and were in fact significant. However, those upgrades come with one unpleasant change, and that is an increase in price to $200.

The magic is back baby! The Saucony Endorphin Speed 2 was and continues to be one of my favorite feeling speedwork/tempo day shoes.  It was bouncy and snappy and a joy to run in, albeit not that stable. Saucony improved the stability in the Endorphin Speed 3, but reports were that it wasn’t as fast and snappy and was trending more towards being an every day trainer. Well, I’m pleased to report that for the Speed 4 Saucony combined all of the best parts of the Speed 2 (bouncy, snappy) and the Speed 3 (stable, comfortable), added in some new features (SRS sockliner, integrated tongue), and did an awesome job in the looks department.

The Speed 4 is one of those shoes that can handle whatever you throw at it. During my workouts, I felt comfortable running at slower paces during warm up and cool down miles and during the active recovery part of intervals. I felt fast and like the shoe was giving me back what I was putting into it during tempo portions of the run.  For someone who wanted to try out plated shoes for racing but not jump directly to carbon plates, the Speed 4 would be a fantastic option.

If you ever find yourself in a scavenger hunt for the Adidas Adios Pro 3, just check a podium at any major marathon these days. There’s a good chance you’ll find one there. There’s no need to exaggerate here: the Adios Pro 3 is a killer race day shoe.

Similar in profile to the Takumi Sen 8, but taller in stack (and thankfully a bit wider), I feel invincible when the Adios Pro 3 is on my feet. No matter the distance, the Adios Pro 3 can handle it all. When the pace kicks into high gear (which for me isn’t blistering), this shoe does almost all of the work for you. It’s as close to cheating as you can get without course cutting.

This is where I’d normally tell you what’s wrong with the shoe. Literally the only thing I can come up with is that the lacing system is a bit wonky, can end up taking multiple re-ties, and may occasionally give some lace bite if overtightened. It’s easily the most stable of all of the super shoes I’ve tried, which in my opinion is a must for any race day shoe for bigger runners. Once the fatigue sets in during long training efforts, or half marathon and above races, super shoes can be unforgiving to bad mechanics thanks to the inherent softness of the foam. I don’t worry about that happening in the Adios Pro 3.

CHAD (SKY PARIS): When the Asics Metaspeed Sky Paris showed up at my door, I could have sworn that Asics had accidentally sent a box with only one shoe in it, because the package was by far the lightest I had ever picked up. The only shoe I ever felt that is lighter was when Thomas let me hold one of his Adidas Adizero Adios Evo Pro 1. The light weight was even more apparent when on the foot; with such a light mesh upper, it almost felt like there was nothing on my feet at all.

Turnover in the Metaspeed Sky Paris was as easy as could be. I laced these up for the Cherry Blossom 10-miler, and couldn’t believe the paces I was able to hit early in the race and towards the end when the fatigue sets in. It’s not the most stable race day offering, but the bounce from the foam and snappiness of the ride make up for it.  But this is just my thoughts on the Sky Paris; Jon Ober is going to hit you with details on the Edge Paris.

JON (EDGE PARIS): As Chad mentioned, this is an incredibly light shoe. I was impressed Asics somehow managed to cut some weight and do more with even less. Admittedly, I was a little nervous about how light these were. A combination of my size and tendency to drag my feet is not a good combination for light super shoes, forcing them to wear down faster and forcing me to retire them way sooner than my peers. Will this be an edge case? (See what I did there?) Let’s find out. 

The fit is near perfect. The upper wraps around my foot comfortably and barely feels like it’s there. My only complaint is that the tongue is flimsy and requires extra attention lacing up. Thankfully it stays in place. 

I was most interested in how the ride differed from the Sky. After dealing with some hip and back injuries last year, I have made an effort to be more conscious with cadence. Since the geometry of this shoe encourages you to naturally propel forward and is for people who run with higher cadence, I figured this was a perfect fit for how I have been running lately. 

It delivered and I was able to nail some key workouts effortlessly. I found myself running at a high cadence naturally instead of staring at my watch nonstop. The midsole is bouncy on liftoff and the absorbed impact great! That said, I found myself getting tired after about 10 miles.The extra forefoot cushioning in the forefoot only did so much. I would reserve these for distances that are half marathon or less. My initial fear that these shoes would get at early retirement were eased as there was minimal wear after testing them.I can tell these will last a long time. 

If there was an award for Most Drastic Update or Most Improved Race Day Shoe, I would like to hereby nominate New Balance for the SC Elite v4. I had run in the RC Elite v2 and the SC Elite v3 previously, and I thought they were very fine shoes. But the FuelCell form in them, which was a supercritical foam, just didn’t have the same feel of the other race day shoes on the market. They were soft underfoot and accommodating in the upper, but they lacked the pop and propulsive feel of shoes like the Vaporfly 2 and Adios Pro 3. I don’t think I could have lasted in the v2 or v3 for more than a half marathon

The newest formulation of FuelCell in the SC Elite v4 features 100% PEBA, and the difference is stark. The shoe now that has that race day feel, but unlike other race day offerings, provides a stable feel throughout. Is it perfect? No, I think some things were odd choices, like the tongue and laces. But the overall feel of this shoe makes me comfortable in saying I would be able to take this a full 26.2.

Normally when a new shoe is released, I remove its predecessor from the list. However, I think the SC Elite v5 is so far different a shoe than the SC Elite v4 that both of them warrant a spot on this list. The SC Elite v5 dropped almost 2 ounces from the v4, and became a far more aggressive race day offering. It is far more nimble, at the expense of the wide platform and stability of the v4.

I always felt like if I needed to wear a race day shoe for a marathon, it would be the SC Elite v4; I’m not sure I can same the same about the v5. That said, I feel like New Balance has crafted an exceptional race day offering for shorter distances, possibly up to a half marathon. The drop has increased from 4mm to 8mm, but with the softness of the PEBA-based FuelCell foam, it actually isn’t that noticeable. Other changes are a far more comfortable upper and a tongue that doesn’t feel like a complete afterthought.